Cookies are used on this site - read my Privacy Policy
© Feel Good Hypnosis 2015-2024
Subscribe
Subscribe to my mailing list and get a FREE eBook
From time to time I like to send out e-mails to keep you
informed of what I am up to, events I’m attending, new
info on hypnosis, news of my latest training events etc.
With Compliments
Books and Mp3’s
As well as my books you’ll find a range
of mp3 downloads you will love.
You can listen to these in the
comfort of your own home and
enjoy an hypnosis experience.
Use the Quick Links below to contact
me and find out how hypnosis can
change your life.
Hypnosis and the Law
Hypnosis is not normally associated with the law or court rooms. Hypnosis can however help witnesses to
recall evidence. Is such evidence gathered through hypnosis admissible as evidence and allowed to be
presented in court?
Hypnosis has been used by lawyers in courts around the world in a
range of cases. Different jurisdictions however have put in place
different rules regarding the admissibility or not of evidence gathered
through hypnosis.
In UK criminal proceedings, evidence gathered through hypnosis is
normally inadmissible. This is due to the concern that the witness who
was under hypnosis may be subject to cueing, caused by such things as
explicit or implicit suggestion by the hypnotist or a fantasy of the
witness that then becomes fixed as a fact in that person’s mind.
In UK criminal proceedings, if the prosecution is relying on a witness who has been hypnotised, they should
ensure that the hypnosis session was recorded on audio or videotape. Such a recording will be disclosable to
the defence. The defence should be informed of the fact the witness has been hypnotised and provided with
details of the session. The hypnotist themselves may be called to give evidence.
Relevant UK Caselaw
R v C [2006] EWCA Crim 231 – In this case the prosecution served as
unused material, a statement from a hypnotherapist. The
complainant had disclosed during hypnosis that she had been
sexually abused by the defendant. The defence called a witness
who sought to admit evidence challenging the hypnotherapist’s
methods. The trial judge ruled that the defence expert’s evidence
was inadmissible. On appeal however the Court of Appeal ruled
that the defence expert’s evidence was admissible.
R v Browning [1995] Crim LR 227 CA – In this case the Court of
Appeal stated that the use of hypnosis should be exceptional.
In Australia the position is that where a prosecution is relying on evidence gathered during hypnosis that fact
must be disclosed to the defence and all information such as video recordings should be disclosed.
In the case of R v Jekyns in New South Wales, the court directed that in order for evidence from hypnosis to be
admissible, the evidence must be limited to matters that the witness can recall before the hypnosis procedure.
Evidence that is first brought to attention during or after hypnosis will not be admissible.
In addition the court set out the further following requirements:
•
There is documentary evidence of the original recollection from
the witness
•
The witness consented to the hypnosis and it was performed by
an experienced and independent hypnotist
•
The hypnosis was performed without the presence of all
relevant parties and was recorded.
We have set out today how the use of hypnosis in court is treated in
different jurisdictions. Each differ to the extent of the admissibility
of evidence gathered through hypnosis and it is likely that
courtroom rules in relation to hypnosis will continue to evolve.
Author:
Shane McCann
Shane is a leading Northern Ireland solicitor with over 12 years experience
in Personal Injury, Business Law and Conveyancing. He focuses on
achieving results and providing a high level of satisfaction for his clients.
For more details on what Shane and SG Murphy can help you with please
click on this link murphysolicitors.co.uk